Showing posts with label Nelson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nelson. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 November 2017

Harriett Wombwell and Charles John Robinson in Numbers

Harriett Wombwell and Charles John Robinson had nine children. This resulted in – and here is an insight into the times – an astonishing fifty-five grandchildren. Harriett lived long enough to witness the birth of twenty-seven of them. Harriett therefore has to qualify as a grand matriarch of the first order. Even Queen Victoria only managed forty-two grandchildren.

Of course in the world that Harriett and Charles were born into, large families were the norm. Infant mortality was high, and life expectancy as a whole therefore lower. But even in those times, a little bit of wealth, coming in this case through Irish land rentals, enabled a better standard of living. The majority of the children survived, and once they had passed the age of five, the chances of them then reaching a healthy old age were dramatically increased, one of the major remaining risks being death during or after childbirth. On the evidence of these Robinson lines, any kind of birth control practice in the extended family was either only sporadically observed, or sporadically successful. The family spread far and wide and at an impressive rate.



Ratcliffe Highway, St George in the East, the parish where Harriett Wombwell was born. Note Jamrach’s animal shop across the road. From: https://www.flickr.com/photos/100027183@N07/9805332785

There must though have been an economic price to pay for this fecundity and new found longevity. Even when the Irish lands of Maria West had finally been auctioned off in 1881, Harriett’s legacy was a very divided one, even for her children. With the large families that these children then had, it cannot have taken very long for their inherited wealth to vanish. They were then left to make their own way through life using their own wits. Most – but not all – sought to find their way out of the London docks, and all that dockland life represented. Some of the children put the technical skills they had learned in the area into practice, through carpentry, engineering, and through engaging with emergent technologies such as bicycle manufacturing, radio equipment, and nautical instruments. Others fell back into more working class pursuits becoming plumbers, boiler repairers, and the like. There were branches too who were attracted to possibilities overseas, and who made their way to new lives and new possibilities in the dominions.

What all of them seemed to have in common, by and large, was the view that life in the London Docks was less a romantic idyll than an evil necessity. As soon as the opportunity came to move on, they did so. London, the great seducer, which had drawn into her web, Essex farmers like the Wombwells, and Irish emigres like Maria West, and brought them into contact with stalwarts of the maritime community, such as the Robinsons, was beginning to lose its allure. Many of the later Robinson descendants left London entirely and moved on, to the South Coast of England, even then popular as a retirement destination, to Yorkshire, to the West country, and to the New Worlds of Australia and Canada.

In 1805, Horatio Nelson famously pronounced, just prior to the Battle of Trafalgar that ‘England expects that every man will do his duty’. This exhortation however conceals the truth that his fleet and crews were extraordinarily cosmopolitan:

Apart from English, Welsh and Scottish, the Irish were by far the largest contingent with over 3573 men indicating that Ireland was their place of birth. There were over 361 American born sailors. There are examples of Swedes (78), Norwegians (25), Prussians (23), Russians (9), Maltese (25), and Italians (115). From France there were 20, and Spain 8. Even from land-locked Austria there were at least 5. From Canada, particularity Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, 31 men. 17 are listed as born in Africa. They were all probably black although race is not given. Similarly, 123 from the West Indies. Probably all former slaves, now free men and sailors. 


Such was the melting pot of Nelson’s fleet. Whether through desperation, compulsion, patriotism, vocation, or simply a sense of adventure, the assorted multicultural fleet of sailors and mercenaries did Nelson proud. For those Robinsons involved, heralding from Shadwell in the heart of the docks, such diversity can hardly have concerned them too much. Indeed, the Docklands population itself would have very much been a mirror of Nelson’s navy.

This was after all, just a part of what it meant to be part of a global trading empire in which movement of goods was accompanied by - as a natural concomitant - movement of people. This is not to say that these docklanders mixed particularly freely. Race, language, religion, colour, education and social class all played a part in the formation of numerous sub-communities within the whole, with the family being a prime unit of operation.

It is fair to presume that the average nineteenth century mariner would not have been awarded too many prizes for a life of temperance, sobriety and abstinence. The taverns and streets of Shadwell must have fairly hummed with scandal, gossip, and knowing looks. But even in such communities there must have been limits. And when Mary Weston – acting perhaps on the presumption that Charles John Robinson was dead, managed to acquire herself ‘three dark children’ in the space of five years, she must have crossed several lines. Blackwood, well over a century later, recording this in the Linen Hall Library would have raised his eyebrows and given a quizzical shake of his head whilst recording the details. For Mary, he wrote very simply ‘public performer?’, his question mark hanging heavily in the air.

In the end though, it is thanks to the amorous but adventurous Mary – with considerable assistance of course from Napoleon - that Charles John went on to meet Harriett Wombwell – and the rest as they say is history – Robinson history, to be precise.

Thursday, 2 November 2017

Mark Robinson Senior

Mark Robinson, 1722-1799
Mark and Charles’ father, Mark Robinson senior, also a naval commander had a similarly colourful career, in which he seemingly also commanded the Brilliant, as well as the Swiftsure, on which his sons were both also to serve. 

Of the elder Mark, the MorethanNelson website tells us that he joined the navy in 1736, sailed for the Leeward Islands in 1759, served for four years off North America from 1767, and then in 1774, secured Nelson’s promotion to acting lieutenant. He was involved in the Battle of Ushant in 1778, and back in the East Indies the following year. He lost his leg to cannon shot at the Battle of the Chesapeake on 5 September 1781. 

The MorethanNelson website further informs us that Mark:

 ‘…married Elizabeth Reade of Portsmouth at St. Benet and St. Peters, Pauls’ Wharf, London on 26 November 1747 and had three sons and three daughters. His eldest son, John Reade Robinson, predeceased him in June 1781 at the age of 32.’

Monday, 30 October 2017

Captain Mark Robinson Junior

The copy of the 1805 Times was not however the only old newspaper taking up space in Harold Eldridge’s boxfile. There was also an original copy of the Morning Advertiser for Saturday February 8th, 1794. 

Scouring this newspaper for items of family significance revealed only the following short item of news for February 6th in Portsmouth:

Sailed out of harbour, the Niger of 32 guns, Captain Legge, and Brilliant, of 28 guns, Captain Robinson, to Spithead.

This was Captain Mark Robinson (1754-1834). The obituary of Mark tells us that:

From the 1799 Naval Chronicle
Admiral Mark Robinson attained the rank of Commander prior to the conclusion of the first American war; and after serving in that capacity on board the Trimmersloop was advanced to Post-rank 21 Sept. 1790. He commanded the Brilliant frigate at the reduction of Calvi, in Corsica, in 1794; the Arethusa 38, in Sir John Borlase Warren’s expedition against Quiberon in 1795; the Swiftsure 74, alluded to in our Memoir of his son; the Royal Sovereign 100, as Flag-Captain to Sir Rich. Bickerton in the Mediterranean during Lord Nelson’s pursuit of the combined squadrons to the West Indies; and subsequently the Gibraltar 80. He became a Rear-Admiral 28 April, 1808, a Vice-Admiral 12 Aug. 1818, and a full Admiral 27 May, 1825. He died 21 Feb. 1834, at Freshfield, near Bath, aged 80.

It was at Calvi in August 1794, that Nelson was to lose one of his eyes. Mark meanwhile, as the obituary reports, had an illustrious career which ended with his appointment as a full admiral. He had just one son, Thomas Pitt Robinson.

Was this then, a relative of the Robinsons of Farmer Street, Shadwell, and that brief snippet of information in the Morning Advertiser the reason the paper was so carefully folded up and kept?




Friday, 20 October 2017

Trafalgar Mysteries

On Thursday November 7th, 1805, one of Hetty Jane Owen’s ancestors strolled down to his local news kiosk and purchased a copy of the Times. The newspaper was kept, and travelled down the generations, fading somewhat until it joined various Wombwell and Bradley oddments in Harold Eldridge’s box file.

The main story in The Times that day was somewhat sensational. The English fleet under the command of Admiral Horatio Nelson had, after an exhaustive pursuit that had taken them to the West Indies and back, finally caught up with the combined French and Spanish fleet just off the coast of Spain. Nelson’s strategy was bold and unconventional, and rested on speed. It was also utterly decisive, and delivered a knockout blow to any ideas Napoleon might have had for invading England, whilst assuring the sea superiority so essential for a maritime empire. 

The nation celebrated and mourned at the same time. Nelson’s body was on its way back to England, along with the wounded commander of the French fleet, Villeneuve, who was to be accorded the dubious privilege of attending Nelson’s state funeral before being allowed to return to France to die the following year, either by suicide, or murdered by Napoleon, depending on which story you prefer to believe.

It was a story of massive historical and national significance, but it still doesn’t quite explain why the newspaper in question was so carefully kept by the generations that followed.